View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2010, 13:13
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Photos of Team 2883's robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this thing's frame would never pass inspection as it sits now. There are just so many things wrong with it. Did you ever see the terms FRAME PERIMETER and BUMPER PERIMETER in the rules? Or look at rule <R07> at all?

Plus as pictured you are getting a penalty for <G46>.
I question how this is definitively violating <R07>. They can easily attach bumpers to it in the appropriate zone, and its unclear whether that frame is 28x38 and thus the bolts etc are or are not clear of the 28x38 dimension.

I concur on <G46>.

My $0.02:

Nuts and bolts are HEAVY. Welds are a much more weight efficient joinery method.
Reply With Quote