View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-02-2010, 20:42
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,189
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What Pushed You Toward Mecanum Drive This Season?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricVanWyk View Post
Note: This season, I am only helping one team, 3044. This team is in its second year, and is not using a mecanum or other holonomic drive.

The field is split into three subfields with aspect ratios that are much wider than they are deep. You'd therefore expect that side to side movement would be favored, and non-holonomic drives would spend more time in that axis.

Ball movement is along the other axis, and therefore you'd expect non-holonomic drives to be in that orientation more often.

This disjoint is what favors mecanums. It allows a team to move the robot left to right while moving the ball up and down. It also removes the need to re-orient after capturing a ball.

I expect this is why we see so many mecanums this year.

A well engineered conventional drive base can maneuver in that tight space with ease and maintain almost any orientation it wants
__________________
Reply With Quote