Thread: Ranking
View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-03-2010, 22:59
Chuck Glick Chuck Glick is offline
Gone Fishin'
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 499
Chuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Glick has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chuck Glick
Re: Ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Collin Fultz View Post
I am personally becomming a fan of this new ranking system. It's really factoring in a strength of schedule into the rankings. In the old system, a 2-0 win was worth the same as a 10-9 win (I know...ranking points...but the W was the most important). Now, a 10-9 win is a HUGE score.
There is an easy way to factor in the difficulty of a match. Take both the red and blue scores (before penalties), add them together, and divide by 2 (or not). There is your match difficulty score. Teams are ranked by win/loss first, then difficulty score. This both promotes scoring and winning.
Reply With Quote