Thread: Ranking
View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-03-2010, 23:53
ubermeister's Avatar
ubermeister ubermeister is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eric VA
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Silver Spring
Posts: 48
ubermeister is a jewel in the roughubermeister is a jewel in the roughubermeister is a jewel in the roughubermeister is a jewel in the rough
Re: Ranking

I would be a fan of the new ranking system if the matches were higher-scoring. Here is an example of what happened to us:

We won a match 3-2 and were very happy, this was a fairly good match for us. Then, a robot on our alliance was assessed 5 <G46> penalties and the other team 1, causing us to lose 0-1. This means we get 2 seeding points. The other team gets 1 + 6 = 7 seeding points. This is a huge number of seeding points when the matches are usually won 1 or 2 to 0 (we only have around 8 seeding points total). A win due to exorbitant penalties on a good alliance is not a strategic win, and should not be rewarded like this.
__________________



Last edited by ubermeister : 05-03-2010 at 23:53. Reason: small mistake
Reply With Quote