View Single Post
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 09:40
rspurlin's Avatar
rspurlin rspurlin is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ray Spurlin
no team (no team)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 69
rspurlin has a spectacular aura aboutrspurlin has a spectacular aura about
Re: Rules, changed by the ref, or correct interpretation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnr View Post
Kettering human players were allowed to use tident to unjam balls. They had one field problem during finals with ball counter. This is what i saw on screen for one team- end of auto=3 then 5 then 7 then 5 then 7 then 9...well their final score was 4. They put a person in each corner after that to count balls. Also it just seemed like the blue side was acting up control wise.
Do you mean that the human player was using the trident to unjam balls on the ball return or in the goals themselves? If in the goals, i can understand why the ball count would be off. The trident could have easily tripped the optoelectronic ball sensor.

We had one incident where a human player hit a jammed ball on the ball return (before it had passed through the return counter) and knocked the ball back onto the field without passing throught he return counter. They earned mucho ball return penalty points.
__________________
Mentor(2007-2013) - Team 1379 - Gear Devils - Norcross, GA
2010 Palmetto regional Semifinalists, Judges Award
2010 Peachtree Regional Quarterfinalists, GM Industrial Design Award
2009 Palmetto Regional Finalists
2008 Bayou Regional Quarterfinalists
2008 Peachtree Regional Semifinalists
2007 Peachtree Regional Quarterfinalists

Georgia FRC Planning Committee

Last edited by rspurlin : 07-03-2010 at 09:42.