View Single Post
  #70   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-03-2010, 20:48
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: A novel strategy: Always score for your opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by pfreivald View Post

118 qualifying points and 22 hanging points shows that your statement here is false. We faced several situations where our alliance partners and our opponents wanted us to engage in this 6v0 shenanigans, and my drivers and field coach (who is a student, by the way) would have none of it. And good on them.

We were quite decidedly *not* screwed.

....

On a final note, I predict that, in the end, 6v0 will not be all that effective. We didn't engage in it even once -- not even a little -- and we had it used 'on us' twice (and we ran up the score as much as we could, because that's what we were there to do).
I'm confused. Did you or did you not play in match that was 6v0? I'm not making a judgement on 6v0, but I'm reading some conflicting information here.