Thread: Team update 16
View Single Post
  #97   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2010, 08:33
Tetraman's Avatar
Tetraman Tetraman is offline
FIRST on my mind
AKA: Evan Raitt
no team
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,322
Tetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team update 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by the man View Post
did any one notice this?

In the event that BALLS become dammed in the GOAL at the mouth of the BALL COUNTER,

I think dammed is ment to be jamed.
technically, dammed is the correct word. Jammed would be just as good, but dammed implies that there is a flow that's being blocked, like a dam.


As to the argument of whether 5 points solves this crisis: I don't think it does, but it makes winning more appealing to those who need the Highest qualifying points possible. I can imagine a situations where 6v0 would still be employed, but only for alliances with robots desperate to get easy qualifying points. Could you imagine if robots block their own goals so opponent's can't score on them?
__________________
"For every great theory about design, there is a better and contradictory theory about design. And don't let the irony of that escape you."
Last edited by Tetraman : 10-03-2010 at 08:38.
Reply With Quote