View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-03-2010, 15:34
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,756
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Autonomous runs during Teleop

I wasn't trying to take off any heads or be offensive. We've all formed a model of how things work based on observations, only to later discover that those models sometimes need to be adjusted.

In post #17, you were giving some pretty strong advice which I would rather people did not follow. In fact it caused others concern and they asked for clarification from me.

Until I can look at the VI, I cannot explain everything, but I can say that it is very unlikely that Abort didn't work. There is no good reason to worry about loops in the auto independent code. In fact it was written the way it is to expressly allow loops.

Again, I know you were trying to help, and in most cases I wouldn't jump in so strongly. But, if we have to get into a tug-of-war as to whose advice to follow, I have to hold my ground. I want to see the evidence -- I want to look at the code -- before I'll buy into the conclusions presented.

Greg McKaskle
Reply With Quote