View Single Post
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-03-2010, 15:06
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,112
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by martin417 View Post
I have a tangential question. I seem to remember hearing that in 2008 team 190 (I think) came up with a novel game solution, and that the GDC made a rule change that made that solution illegal. I may be mis-remembering, or was mis-informed. Does anybody remember what I am talking about? I just went through the updates from 2008 and didn't see any game-changing rules changes, but thought someone might remember if something like that occured.
If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, there wasn't really a rule change. I think there was just a pointed clarification of a particular definition (clockwise vs. counterclockwise travel) that already made the execution of that particular solution impossible in practice.