View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2010, 21:39
Radical Pi Radical Pi is offline
Putting the Jumper in the Bumper
AKA: Ian Thompson
FRC #0639 (Code Red Robotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 655
Radical Pi has a spectacular aura aboutRadical Pi has a spectacular aura aboutRadical Pi has a spectacular aura about
Re: How does 469 not violate <R19>?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
That would depend on the method of bypassing the block. Again, if the switcher is moving, it would be. However, you do risk a <G38> (intentional outside the bumper zone), depending on how the ref calls it, or a <G13> (can't make your opponents get a penalty). It's a risky move, and only effective on one side.
I don't think G38 would apply because I believe the blocking team is on the bump, which is an explicit exception to the rule. G13 also may not apply since it was 469's choice to run the switcher. The only thing that was forced by the other team is the balls being jammed on the return, which may or may not count as multiple possession, although G13 would null that penalty. It does depend on the ref's call though
__________________

"To have no errors would be life without meaning. No strugle, no joy"
"A network is only as strong as it's weakest linksys"