View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-03-2010, 07:19
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,746
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Rule Changes

We often think of exploitation as being negative. Dictionary.com gives 3 senses of exploit - positive, negative and neutral:
Quote:
–verb (used with object)
1.to utilize, esp. for profit; turn to practical account: to exploit a business opportunity.
2.to use selfishly for one's own ends: employers who exploit their workers.
3.to advance or further through exploitation; promote: He exploited his new movie through a series of guest appearances.
Taking advantage of game rules for the team's benefit is exploitation of those rules, but in and of itself that is neither positive or negative. It's how teams should look at strategy.

If a team thought any particular strategy or design would be negative exploitation of the rules and chose not to do it, that's their decision. That another team decided it would be a positive benefit is another decision. Neither is right or wrong.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote