View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-03-2010, 11:26
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: disaster in israel regional

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tottanka View Post
- Don't be so sure that this award should have been yours. It's not GP to say and even think so in my opinion. It's just an award and if you think you deserve it, it's far more important. If the Judges were so sure that this award belong to a team, that team would have received it.
According to the results posted on FIRSTs website, team 3088 was the team that *should* have received the Coopertition(TM) Award. This award is to be awarded to the team that receives the most Coopertition Points.

I suspect that it was not awarded due to the abnormally low number of matches played.

I disagree that it is "un-GP" to claim that one deserved a merit based award such as this, when the person making that claim did GENUINELY meet the requirements for the award.