I _could_...but I would need to edit LOTS of the code (since it's totally customized for my computer and directories) and I would need lots of space for the images and stuff. I would also need the ImageMagick perl module which not many people have unless it's needed. For now, my PC works well for a server (well...not really, but it's cheap  )
As for flash ruling...eww...no. It may be pretty...but other than that...eww. All HTTP browsers support HTML (well...AFAIK ) but not all support a closed-source, undocumented plugin. The flash on team84.org is horrendous. It's so poorly used. I believe they just copied someones premade buttons and change the color and the text. I also like the size of text. 4 bytes is much nicer than 5kb. Flash is also too hard to maintain.
I'll just stick with my pretty HTML For it's an open standard and simple. (The closer I get to being w3c-compliant, the better  )
__________________
I'm a professional web developer. I'm good with PHP, Perl, Java/JSP, some RoR, XML, Javascript (AJAX as well), (x)HTML, CSS, etc.. Validated code is good; fully cross-browser code is better (you comply to your users and the software they use, not the other way around. Sorry!)
|