View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-03-2010, 08:39
sircedric4's Avatar
sircedric4 sircedric4 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Darren
no team (The SS Prometheus)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Lousiana
Posts: 245
sircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond reputesircedric4 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New Vs Old Qualification 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by sircedric4 View Post
The last time I looked at Michigan the FRC standings or match data was incomplete. I will look again and see if its updated and get that out tomorrow.



This is one reason I wanted to get the data out there, to find any errors. I will look at this regional with the data you've provided tomorrow and see if I can find a satisfactory answer.

Thanks everybody for your comments. I hope to have this fully functional and in our pits at the Nationals.

Michigan was left out because I forgot to look in the District events category. I am as about as far south as you can get from you so I tend to forget Michigan's on a different system. The Michigan District data is now in the file if you want to look at it.

The reason the match numbers are wrong in San Diego (its also wrong in Finger Lakes) is because it is wrong in the standings from FIRST. I calculate all my stuff correctly in the old data, but when it comes time to print out the data I just use the FIRST match data column from the new system. FIRST is doing something wrong in their code when calculating number of matches. I have fixed my code to use my own match counting system for future iterations but I am not going to rerun all the regionals for a misprint. The calculations are right as they stand, that one column maybe wrong depending on FIRST.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Regional Summary -3-22.zip (41.7 KB, 12 views)