|
Re: Team Update #18
Quote:
|
I don't know how often teams tie in Seeding Score but if they did it seems that it is reasonable to sort based on cumulative rather than highest coopertition points. Not that I am a fan of coopertition points but if you are going to reward based on them you can make a case that lots of singles are better than 1 grand slam.
|
I definitely agree on cumulative trumping single score. I also wonder how often it will be used. I do think, and am ready for, seeding points to become a much larger focus, especially in MI at the State championships. Since it is possible we will have a couple of game breaker bots, top alliance picks are critical and we will in turn see higher coopertition points but not because of Update 18.
__________________
What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is what we do.
2010 REFEREE: Kettering, Ann Arbor, Wayne State, Troy, MI Championship, Atlanta-Newton field, IGVC TARDEC, MARC and upcoming KETTERING Kickoff.
|