View Single Post
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2010, 11:46
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How Do mecanum wheels handle the bumps?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
Under the covers, when on a diagonal, software tells 2 motors to drive the diagonal while the other two motors sit idle. This allows the diagonal strafe. Yet when pushing while on this diagonal, the bot effectively has 70% * 1/2 (due to 2 motors out of 4) = 35% of the original torque of the 4 CIM setup. Ergo, Mecanum drive trains with true holonomic control only ever apply 35% to 70% of 4CIMs to any direction.
On the diagonal, all the torque of those two motors is working in the direction of travel. You get 100% of two motors, or 50% of a 4 motor traditional drivebase.

(The original LabVIEW omni/mecanum drive vi took that into account and reduced the maximum power in the forward/sideways directions to 70% of what it could be. That gave 50% of full motor torque in every direction. It was a good idea for making consistently-controllable omnidirectional movement easy, but it was a terrible idea for being able to call on the most performance when necessary.)