View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2010, 17:38
fordchrist675's Avatar
fordchrist675 fordchrist675 is offline
"Wilfordito"
AKA: Wilford Jay Harris III
FRC #0675 (Technology High School Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Rohnert Park, California
Posts: 298
fordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to fordchrist675 Send a message via MSN to fordchrist675 Send a message via Yahoo to fordchrist675
Re: Penalties for a part falling off of robot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Brinza View Post
At the Los Angeles Regional, a number of penalties were issued for damaged robots leaving parts on the field. Even in the finals, a penalty was issued to Team 330 because a chain failed and ended up on the field.

It seems to me that having a part fail and losing capability in a robot is enough of a penalty for an alliance. Isn't tacking on an additional point penalty like pouring salt in a wound?

The intent of <R16> (which can be invoked under <S04>), is to prevent teams from gaining an advantage by expanding outside of the frame perimeter prior to the FINALE period. Having a part of the drive system fail so that it's now left the frame perimeter is hardly an advantage for the team involved.

Is this penalty the norm at other regionals?
At SVR I didn't see it called too many times, It didnt happen in the finals I was a little perplexed by it cause I read the rules as if a part broke, fell, or came off it would result in a penalty.
__________________
It's not by how much you win, it's how you win. Respect your enemies, otherwise your no better than them which if you think about it that's true because we are striving for the same thing. To be FIRST

2010 SVR Creativity Award
2010 SVR Regional Finalists
2010 SAC Innovation in Control Award