View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2010, 08:21
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,757
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 4 Match Finals & Biggest Tie Match

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunbun View Post
I think that the FMS is only capable of three matches per set of two alliances. It can't really "create" a 4th match, so when there's a tie someone has to manually go and "replay" one of the matches that tied.

This is why Final 4 is actually "Final 1." You can see this happening around TBA when the winners of Final 3 aren't actually the regional winners.
Which is exactly in compliance with the rules in Section 9.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9.4.3
In order to allow equal time between matches for all ALLIANCES, the order of play will be:
QF1-1, QF2-1, QF3-1, QF4-1,
Then QF1-2, QF2-2, QF3-2, QF4-2,
Then QF1-3*, QF2-3*, QF3-3*, QF4-3*
Then any QF replays due to ties*
Then SF1-1, SF2-1, SF1-2, SF2-2, SF1-3*, SF2-3*
Then any SF replays due to ties*
Then F-1, F-2, F-3*
Then any F replays due to ties*
(* - if required)
(Note "replays due to ties")
__________________
(since 2004)