Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
nearly tied? 1902 is clearly creating more dominate robots on a yearly basis.
|
I was referring to the "program". 1902 obviously has 1714 beat, hands down, on robot performance. I am not without bias for my old team though in either department.
1902's 2009 robot was directly comparable to 1714's 2009 effort in terms of quality IMHO, as are the robots this year. Slight edge to 1902 this year, last year, I dunno.
08 is no contest 1902, as is 07, and probably 06.