View Single Post
  #88   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-04-2010, 00:54
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Best Robots by Age

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laaba 80 View Post
please explain your logic. Yes they had better robots in our first years, but we have had much more success in the past two years.
Robot wise, I'm not sure about that (atleast when going by the numbers). Both teams have 2 regional wins. 1714 has made eliminations at 3/4 regionals and is 0/1 in Atlanta. 1902 is 4/4 at regionals and 1/1 in Atlanta. 1902 was probably gone to tougher regionals, but won Connecticut as 3rd robot compared to 1714's back to back wins as top seed in a 'young' Minnesota Regional.

Overall 1714 is 7/10 in regionals and 1/3 in Atlanta. 1902 is 10/10 in regionals and 3/4 in Atlanta.

But, I think 1714 has just as big an advantage on the non-technical awards.

Last edited by XaulZan11 : 06-04-2010 at 00:56.
Reply With Quote