|
Re: Division Strengths 2010
I think it shows a more accurate representation of MSC strength. Stretching it moves MSC's Number 3 OPR guy to compare relative to a divsions number 4. this artifically inflates the MSC from a visual perspective. Some other interesting points would be the bump in the MSC curve from 10-30. I would suspect that these 20 would show an improving trend if you graphed their OPRs versus events.
I would be really interested in comparing 2010 MSC data to a theoretical 2008 MSC. Both are robot centric games with higher OPR correlation to match outcomes.
************************
Back to the intent of the thread, it looks like I will need some stronger coffee for Friday night as the picklist debate will be very difficult for Archimedes. (not that i am assuming we will seed in the top 8, but even if we were 80th, we would still make a comprehensive list).
|