View Single Post
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-04-2010, 10:43
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,063
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Championship 2010 - Atlanta - Your Thoughts Please?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared341 View Post
I would say that there should be no obligation to use all four, but the fourth is your only backup (like at IRI).

This would only make sense at CMP (where I think it would be a great idea).
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefro526 View Post
Yes, I meant that during Alliance Selections a Captain would pick 3 teams, to make a 4 team alliance but only 3 of these teams would play during the match.

Basically, I envision it as a "pick your own backup" type of system, so that teams can switch out if they break and continue to play once they are fixed.

As far as play goes though, I don't think that the Alliance should be forced to use this fourth team to play, though it would be nice if the team were given a shot.

Perhaps FIRST can amend the rules next year to allow this to happen at events with more than 50 teams or so.
My logic for forcing teams to use the 4th robot is so that the last team plays an integral part in the alliance. Imagine a scenario where Team A is chosen by Alliance 1 and goes on to win the Championship but Team A never played. Can they say they were part of the Alliance? They were but they didn't play an active role.
__________________




.