Quote:
Originally Posted by 1075guy
What if you did something like:
Win: W+2L+C
Lose: (1/(W-L) * L)+ L + W
This way:
A 20-2 match gives 29 SS to the winner, 22.1 SS to the loser, and a 20-18 match gives 61 SS to the winner, and 47 SS to the loser.
|
A 18 point difference from the winner and the loser gets a 7 point SS difference? I agree with most of the earlier ideas that winner's points should not get included in the loser's SS.
If there's a 20-2 match, I say the alliance that only scored 2 deserves only 4 seeding points even if it means a 25 SS difference, since it isn't fair for a horrible alliance to get a big boost in seeding just because they got caught against 3 powerhouses.
With a 20-18 game, it was a narrow defeat, so I'm fine with the loser getting a nice big boost in seeding (36 loser points vs. 61 winner points. Makes much more sense than 18 vs. 61
Alternatively, what if the score difference subtracted from seeding points, such as this formula (winner remains same as current)
loser: (2*L)-(Difference/2) (nothing below zero)
__________________
"To have no errors would be life without meaning. No strugle, no joy"
"A network is only as strong as it's weakest linksys"