Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Grady
Moral? Of course not. My point is that I don't feel 6v0 is morally right either. Yeah it benefits 6 teams, but what about the teams who never had a match with 469? They didn't even have the opportunity to go out and try to match the score because that is how scheduling works. It is not fair to those teams. What about the teams who wanted to play the game?
|
I cannot speak for 1114 and thier partners in match 100, but when we did it (match 17), I made sure the drivers had a backup plan, in case our partners wanted to play the match straight up, 3v3. We would have completely understood and respected any team that wanted to play it normally. Atleast for our case, both our partners agreed to the 6v0.
Our strategy in match 17 didn't really affect 1114, 27 and 88's plan. They could still score, play defense if they wanted to and hang at the end. The only thing that we prevented them from doing was scoring in our goals, which really isn't a big deal. They could still enjoy playing to together, but got a little help from us and were encourged to score in their own goals.