View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 11:48
Mike o.'s Avatar
Mike o. Mike o. is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mike O'Brien
FRC #1086 (Blue Cheese)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 133
Mike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud ofMike o. has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Mike o. Send a message via Yahoo to Mike o.
Re: Curie Match 100, 28-0

I will agree with all the discussion that YES, the 6v0 strategy does not break any rules. Although, the ultimate thing to look at is that it does not lie with the spirit of the game and does not induce a fair and fun competition.

Many of pointed out that 1114 worked with 469 in the match so that they could boost up in the rankings and ultimately ended up the #1 seed. Also, many of us knew that put into the position, 1114's first pick would undoubtedly be 469. With all that said, if we are going to have teams know what teams they are already going to pick AND these teams are going to game to system to ensure that they are put in the positions that give them that power, then why have the qualifications matches. Also, I spent my whole time at Champs up till Einstein volunteering on Curie, and I can tell you that this was the only time that a match like this happened.

I know that on Galileo my team was playing their hearts out and were rewarded with being the #1 seed. We also talked several nights about who we would like to pick, but always kept in mind that at any moment we could be knocked out of our comfortable position.

I feel that teams just need to let the game play out the way it is intended to and let those rise to the top that work hard. Gaming the system just shows that you are willing to do anything and everything to ensure that you get what you want and to not let the situation play out. It also in my opinion isn't very gracious or professional.

I was on the floor watching the finals, and it was really interesting seeing how many teams were cheering against the Curie alliance, from all the other divisions, not just those from Archimedes. It was clear that a lot of teams felt the same about this powerful alliance and did not really agree with the ways on which they went about handling it.

Again, these are just my observations, thoughts, and comments. I just would have liked to see a little more class and sportsmanship from these teams in how they handled the game and let the games play out and not have gamed the match. Overall though, I would have to say I really liked the game, the seeding system, and the quality of play that was a result of many hard working teams.
__________________
Mike O'Brien
Founder, Almuni, & Mentor Team 1086
2010 GAL Division Finalist & Coopertition Award; NC Regional Winner & Quality Award; VA Regional Winner & Engineering Inspiration Award Winner
2009 CMP Team Spirit Award; VA Regional Winner & Chairman's Award
2008 VA Regional Winner & Chairman's Award
2007 & 2006 VA Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technology" Award
2005 VA Team Spirit Award; 2004 VA Imagery Award; 2003 Rookie Year
Reply With Quote