View Single Post
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-05-2010, 13:37
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 249
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on CoOpertition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman View Post
... it seems contradictory that they give out the Champion and Finalist Awards to those who successfully complete the *elimination* round game challenge, where the seeding system is thrown out the window ...
Perhaps. Teams are recognized for Quality and Design; of course those awards do not qualify them for the Championship ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman View Post
To me, keeping the seeding system, while getting rid of 6v0 and scoring for opponent scenarios, ... and make the whole shebang a lot more sensible and enjoyable affair for all teams in the field, top to bottom, as well as the people in the seats.
Agree, the incentive to play 6 versus 0 and scoring for opponents needs to go. I don't think that rules prohibiting such game play should be installed; I think that would only create headaches for referees. That is why I suggested the change in the seeding system a few posts earlier. If you want to include an incentive to play some defense, keep the winner bonus points.