View Single Post
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-05-2010, 07:26
Collin Fultz's Avatar
Collin Fultz Collin Fultz is offline
Registered User
no team (IndianaFIRST)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 776
Collin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeCollin Fultz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Attempting the impossible

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratdude747 View Post
reasons to ban the belt from your drivetrain;

1. belts have a lesser surface of contact. therefore, they skip and slip under less torque

2. related to #1, belts are harder to tension as belts stretch at a faster pace.

3. weight- belt sprockets are HEAVY. unless you have access to a CNC or a very precise mill and operator. if not, you will pay a weight penalty.

4. length- chain can be made shorter and longer, belts cannot.
We (Team 234) did a lot of work on this subject. You should check out our whitepaper. We set up a pretty good (in our opinion) Design of Experiments to test our hypothoses.

While you're correct, belts do require you to be more diligent in your design work, we found them to be slightly more efficient and lighter (using only manual tools) than an equivalent chain system.

We also did the "Put it against the wall and drive forward and see what gives first" test. The Roughtop-Plaction wheels slipped against the carpet before the belts slipped on the pulleys.
__________________
Collin Fultz
Reply With Quote