View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2010, 22:13
kenavt's Avatar
kenavt kenavt is offline
Registered User
AKA: Colin S
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 253
kenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond reputekenavt has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rule change suggestions for MARC 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy1718 View Post
Maybe early expansion if the intent is obviously to hang? I hated when you could tell people were trying to hang before the last 20 secs and they would get bumped off the tower for a sec while trying to line up, get a penalty and negate their effort. Also it would encourage more hanging. I havn't cross referanced the team list or anything, but I remember a ton of robot who took a long time to line up, would get it, and the buzzer would sound before they could lift. Many will chalk it up to design flaws, but it is the off season lets shoot for the most fun and not so many pesky rules.
I would have to agree with this. A couple of times we would go to hang early, only to get penalties because we would be an inch away from the tower. It was noticeable, but... we were not trying to completely choke the game by then expanding and blocking the whole field, or punching out an arm to knock a robot out.

Perhaps... within five inches of the tower, you can go into final configuration mode, or something. I think it's too late for a team to design a robot to be a chokehold on the game because of that rule now, so that's what I'll advocate.
__________________
University of Michigan Computer Engineering '17

FRC 2337 student alumni (2010-2013)