View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-05-2010, 21:16
EricVanWyk EricVanWyk is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,597
EricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to EricVanWyk
Re: Using a star configuation for Jaguars on CAN

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
How important was it to have equal length arms? If that's vital that would be a deal killer for us since all that wire hanging around would start to look ugly real fast.
I'm not positive, but I think it is important. Only way to find out is to try (and measure signal integrity).

Since I changed jobs I don't have access to the RF / SI simulators. Perhaps one of our forum members could rig something up?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
An active star module that allowed every jaguar to remain at it's default address of 0 would be very cool. You'd determine which address it had by the jack it was plugged into on the star module, just like PWM. The active module would handle translating the address from the cRio and rebroadcasting the signal to each device with the proper address. The advantage is then if a Jaguar fails, you just slap in a new one. I know that's just a fantasy, though.
Costs associated are:
microcontroller + FPGA per board
CAN transceiver+ Connector + terminators per leg

Not something I can justify for the KoP. Also, it takes a bit of work to make sure you don't get the bus latched into a dominant bit. Lastly, propagation delay is a concern.