Quote:
Originally Posted by Zflash
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
1 1319 343 1319 1319 342 343 343
2 343 1319 343 342 1319/343 1319/342 1319
3 342 342 342 343 342
If you go back to 1319's rookie year of 2004 and compare the robots for each year in my opinion the robot performance area between our two teams is a dead heat. Although I am sure someone will debate my ranking as I do have a slight bias  |
If I were to create the same list I would have:
2004
1319 342 343
2005
343 342 1319
2006 (this is the toughest decision for #1)
343 1319 342
2007
1319 343 342
2008
343 1319 342 (although after the improvements from 1319, it was pretty much even for all three teams b/c all three had well above average robots)
2009
343 342 1319 (another close call for all three, but after our improvements for championships I placed us first)
2010
343 1319 342
But I also would want someone with no bias but a knowledge of all three teams to do this list
