
22-06-2010, 01:15
|
 |
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
 FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,720
|
|
|
Re: pic: sheet metal 6WD
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
The moment of intertia of the cross section is directly related to it's stiffness.
If you google, you'll see for a rectangle, the moment of inertia is 1/12bh^3 (base and height). Base being the side parallel to the axis the beam is being bent around.
So, a 5" tall .050" thick plate has an I = 1/12(5in)(.050in)^3 ~ 5x10^-5.
The same beam with two 1" flanges is that I plus the I of the two flanges. I = 1/12(.050)(1)^3= .004
So the beam with the two flanges has a total I of .004+.004+5x10^-5 ~.084.
.084 / (5x10^-5) ~150:1.
Even if I made a mistake in the math somewhere, this demonstrates the difference flanges make in design. I could go on for pages elaborating this, but it'd better to google and look yourself (key terms being beam, cross section, moment of inertia, etc...). You'll also then understand why I-beams are shaped the way they are.
|
I meant how much of a strength difference does cutting part of the flange out for the gearbox make? A poster said that it would be much stronger, and I wanted to know how much.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
|