View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-06-2010, 15:11
Alex.Norton's Avatar
Alex.Norton Alex.Norton is offline
Fidgetting
no team
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Ft. Collins, Colorado
Posts: 190
Alex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud ofAlex.Norton has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Alex.Norton Send a message via MSN to Alex.Norton
Re: pic: Cone-Wheel Concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesCH95 View Post
I see your point, though it won't slip ONLY when 2 are in contact with the ground, which will be a fraction of the time that the wheel is spinning.

I do not, however, see how this achieves omni-drive because the wheels cannot roll with a component of motion parallel to their drive axle like an omni wheel or Mecanum wheel.
No, only a single roller needs to be in contact with the ground for this to work since the two wheels Andrew is referring to would be the opposite ends of a single roller. However, I can't possibly imagine how this would result in omni directional movement. Both styles of omni drive that FIRST sees (holonomic, and mechanum) are based upon a wheel that can only produce a force vector in a single direction and will spin freely in the other direction. This wheel will not freely move in any direction when driven, if fact it should produce a torque vector perpendicular to the floor upon which it rests.

Although that could make an interesting Swerve system. Use the torque vector produced by the wheels to turn the modules, basically moving the wheels similarly to a mechanum when it strafes?
__________________
"History doesn't repeat itself - at best it sometimes rhymes" --Mark Twain

Last edited by Alex.Norton : 22-06-2010 at 15:15. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote