Thread: CAN reliability
View Single Post
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-07-2010, 16:23
kamocat's Avatar
kamocat kamocat is offline
Test Engineer
AKA: Marshal Horn
FRC #3213 (Thunder Tech)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 894
kamocat is just really nicekamocat is just really nicekamocat is just really nicekamocat is just really nicekamocat is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to kamocat Send a message via MSN to kamocat
Re: CAN reliability

I want to know when a Jaguar is lost, and quickly, so my code can deal with the problem of (a) not getting feedback on that motor, (b) not being able to control that motor, and (c) reenabling/reconfiguring that Jaguar when communication is regained.

I think I'm starting to see why the Jaguars support motor control through PWM with simultaneous feedback through CAN. But that brings the benefit of CAN to nearly nothing, because you now have the issues with the PWM cables: no keying (easy to put in backwards), easy to wire the cable to the wrong controller, cables are fragile and pins bend easily. It's even the same cable as on the GPIO, Relay outputs, and Analog Inputs.


About the Enumeration, though, I wonder if I could cut that wait function shorter? Would it just cut off some of the motor controllers if they were above that value?

Also, I'll retest that series vs parallel thing to see if parallel executes faster when one of the controllers is unplugged.
__________________
-- Marshal Horn

Last edited by kamocat : 27-07-2010 at 16:27.
Reply With Quote