Quote:
Originally Posted by PAR_WIG1350
you don't, you just perform the same operation a few million times and divide. 
|
I don't suppose there's any reason to perform it with changing input values, is there? Computers take just as long to multiply 0x0 as they do 57x291, correct?
Just in case, I used a random-number generator. (This prevents LabVIEW from compiling the results as constants in the program)
It took about 0.000492ms per iteration of the sine function, measured over a million iterations. To put it on the same scale as Ether's measurement, that's 0.5 microseconds.