View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-20-2010, 07:36 AM
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,589
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
If you could Breakaway all over again...

I'm particularly curious and bored this morning, so here's something that's been on my mind for awhile for a thread.

If you could re-do your 2010 build and competition season over again, how would you do it differently, and why?

There was a lot of potentially missed opportunity this year. Only one team successfully pulled off the redirection strategy. Not a lot of teams had adequate ball control, zone traversion ability, or hanging. What mistakes did you make, and how would you learn from them if 2010 repeated itself? Anything from strategy to build to competition.

My answer below to kick things off.

-----

Strategy wise, I would have probably pursued prototyping a redirector. A lot of teams are going to say it, but 2791 brought up the idea and quickly dismissed it because we didn't think we could get the balls to reach all the way over to the goals, among other reasons. We had the "midfield oriented" design approach, we knew the center was the most important, we had the high traction... we just missed the opportunity to close the last link in ball acquisition.

In build season, I wish we abandoned hanging and spent all of that time making sure ball control was rock solid. We saw and talked to (?) 1726 and from that we thought ball control would be pretty easy to do with a roller. We obviously thought wrong. I'm tempted to say we should have tried harder to get over the bumps, but it was a main focus for our team throughout build and we were nearly there. We just ran out of time at the end to get over.

In competition, I wouldn't have changed a thing. We drove as we probably should have for both events. We picked great partners both times. Ultimately, we did what we came to do.


Your turn
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote