01-10-2010, 15:23
|
 |
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,940
|
|
|
Re: [FTC]: New Tetrix Parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBot
...What IS certain is that there is no position feedback.
|
OK - I'll ask... Can anyone tell me why they would call this gizmo a "Servo" instead of calling it a motor? Maybe to pander to some RC enthusiasts that call any motor (except the main drive motor for a vehicle) a Servo? I'm confused.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joyride_67_1902
Sadly the rule with using VEX parts in FTC was removed last year. Using VEX tread would be illegal even if they had the same size link....
|
Do the currrent rules allow replacement parts of any sort?
Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|