|
Re: [FTC]: Possession of Rolling Goal Question
I suppose the problem is that the definition is a lot more vague than the pull test and can be interpreted many different ways. I think the purpose of the definition was to say, "the robot cannot constrain the goal's movement to the movement of the robot, i.e. the robot cannot enclose the goal." But that came across a little differently. The GDC is handling it fairly well, but I think that maybe a little more organization on the forums would help teams, as you guys said earlier.
|