Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me
I believe a larger pinion was put on the large CIM to compensate for this.
|
If the large and small CIMs were geared so that each one was running at the same percent of its own no-load speed, then the large+small combination should be more power-efficient than the small+small combination, according to the motor curves I have for the large and small CIMs.
If there's a piece of the puzzle that's missing perhaps someone from Team 75 who was involved in this analysis would clarify.