View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-12-2010, 16:47
EricVanWyk EricVanWyk is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,597
EricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to EricVanWyk
Re: Dynamically parallel

I don't have any hard numbers, but it shouldn't be that bad. In fact, I use almost exactly this method in a program that I'm working on now. To me, it just isn't an accurate representation of a typical use case for FRC.

Also, if this method is used incorrectly, it can force LabVIEW to set up and tear down the VI each time the command is called. These are advanced functions, and shouldn't be thrown around without reason.



As for maintainability, I think it would be much more legible to explicitly have all the VIs plopped down in parallel.
Reply With Quote