Hey its the constitution its just vague enough to say that the federal government can pass any laws it deams neccessary. It's called the elastic clause. Thus as long as the judicial section of the govenrment agrees that the law is constitutional they can do what they need to do. Remeber the constitution says you can have guns  but it doesn't say that there can't be laws regulating how you buy guns.
Quote:
|
Think on this, if all or most of the people have guns, would you ever want to rob someone? And if you think that a good pistol is useless in self defense you really need to rethink that.
|
Ahh yes but there is a little problem. Having a gun doesn't mean your not going to stop everyone from comitting crimes.. If that logic actually worked than it should have stopped all crime because all cops have guns. Plus if you use a pistol on a person that is unarmed in self defense then your going to be in a lot of trouble.
__________________
If either a public officer or any one else saw a person attempting to cross a bridge which had been ascertained to be unsafe, and there were no time to warn him of his danger, they might seize him and turn him back without any real infringement of his liberty; for liberty consists in doing what one desires, and he does not desire to fall into the river. -Mill
Last edited by Adam Y. : 17-10-2002 at 18:38.
|