Originally Posted by EricH

Au contraire!

FIRST would not release a document with their logo missing parts without a very good reason. Remember, their logo is trademarked/copyrighted, and as such the proper format needs to be used (i.e., copyright/trademark logos as necessary).

If those items are missing--as they are--and there is no organizational tag (also part of the logo for all intents and purposes), and this is on a logo that FIRST itself has put out, then there must be a very good reason.

If an organization violates its own logo-usage guidelines, there is either a very good reason or someone has a lot of explaining and fixing to do. I go with very good reason. What that reason is remains to be seen.