View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 11:43 PM
ChristopherBuck's Avatar
ChristopherBuck ChristopherBuck is offline
Registered User
FRC #0612
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 38
ChristopherBuck is a jewel in the roughChristopherBuck is a jewel in the roughChristopherBuck is a jewel in the rough
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
I was thinking (dangerous I know) that it would be possible for the minibots to either have a tower contact button or a "you're on your own" dead-man switch, and just be running a program all match that said, wait until X switch toggles to the other position. Minimal programming needed. Or have the NXT in a standard-ish area so a servo mounted on a "flexible" arm could hit the run button easily.
I like the idea of the dead man switch. What about if the dead man switch kept a power switch open on the minibot, and when the dead man switch falls out, the circuit is closed, and the minibot powers on?

Quote:
Originally Posted by luc.bettaieb View Post
Yeah, I'd say as much as possible teams should strive to make their robots be able to launch any kind of minibot that can fit in the 12x12x12 inch dimensions.
I agree. And at the same time, teams should construct their minibots such that they dont have any oddities that may hinder deployment by some systems such as curved faces; they may not work with certain implementations of a push deployment


I believe that minibots should be designed such that they are deployment-mechanism-agnostic, be it by pushing, swinging, or something else, because teams will end up having to make different deployment mechanisms based on how the rest of their robot is designed

Last edited by ChristopherBuck : 01-08-2011 at 11:46 PM.