View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 11:10
PhilBot's Avatar
PhilBot PhilBot is offline
Get a life? This IS my life!
AKA: Phil Malone
FRC #1629 (GaCo: The Garrett Coalition)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 747
PhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond reputePhilBot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Controlling the Mini-bot. How?

That's my point.....

The way I read the allowable parts... a Touch Sensor is NOT a legitimate method to stop the minibot's motion because it's strictly not a "Limit Switch" in the sense of the word (Just like an electromagenet is not a Solenoid actuator).

Yes, it's a touch sensor (I suspect that the phrase "limit switch" does not appear on the LEGO site anywhere.) that could be used to detect the end of travel, and be used to stop the bot. But so could a light sensor, or an Ultrasonic sensor (we do it all the time in FTC). Are these "Limit Switches" ? I think so, but would an inspector? What about an altimeter ))

Without being more specific there is a world of possible interpretations of what a "Limit Switch" is. As usual if they are going to inspect these bots, the inspectors need a clear picture of what a Limit Switch is and is not .

If they really are merging the worlds of FRC, FTC and FLL, then "Any LEGO Part" starts entering the vocabulary.
__________________
Phil Malone
Garrett Engineering And Robotics Society (GEARS) founder.
http://www.GEARSinc.org

FRC1629 Mentor, FTC2818 Coach, FTC4240 Mentor, FLL NeXTGEN Mentor
Reply With Quote