Thread: Mecanum or 6WD
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 17:20
,4lex S.'s Avatar
,4lex S. ,4lex S. is offline
University Mentor
AKA: Alex Strong
FRC #2702 (REBotics)
Team Role: College Student
  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 195
,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of,4lex S. has much to be proud of
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
Speed: Equal
Maneuverability: Mecanum
Traction: 6WD
Difficulty in Design: Mecanum
Power Consumption: equal
I disagree with difficulty in design. The programming, as well as driver training is a much greater requirement for a good mecanum system (I have built an omnidirectional system before, and I say this even considering the availability of example code). The maneouvrability is also a lot tighter than you would think (strafing is not as much of an advantage as most people think). In the end, with a well designed system, it is driver skill, either way.

If I recall, 80%+ of championship Einstein robots have been tank drive over the years.
__________________
University of Waterloo Mechanical Engineering Class of 2014- 2B School Term
University of Waterloo Formula SAE Race Team 2010-Eternity
FRC 2702: REBotics 2011 Mentor ::: FRC 1006: Fast Eddie Robotics 2005-2009 Alumni ::: FLL 4050: 2004 Alumni
Reply With Quote