Thread: FAQ for Q&A
View Single Post
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 20:10
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,827
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FAQ for Q&A

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirteenOfTwo View Post
The penalty wouldn't come from <G61>, but <G61> does state that "any rule violations committed by the affected ALLIANCE shall be excused", which would include the violation of <G61> that negated the first penalty.
It's still <G61>. NO PENALTY. Team 2 made a legitimate defensive maneuver, taking a gamble that they wouldn't be pushed in, and figuring that there would be no penalty if they did under <G61>. They lost the gamble. Still no <G61> penalty. It's legitimate defense.

Good defense: getting to where your opponent wants to go and trying to keep them out.

Great offense: Going to where you want to go despite any defense, doing what you were going to do there, and doing it again.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote