Thread: Mecanum or 6WD
View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:28
Mr_I's Avatar
Mr_I Mr_I is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tom Indelicato, 811 Moderator, Mentor, Parent, ...
FRC #0811 (Cardinals)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 194
Mr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant futureMr_I has a brilliant future
Re: Mecanum or 6WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Schornak View Post
Realigning a 6WD robot to hang a tube involves backing off less than 7 feet (so as to avoid opponents), turning a bit, driving forward a bit, turning back a bit, and then finally reattempting the hang. Whatever advantage you had in zooming across the field has been lost in your inability to quickly and accurately hang a piece.
True, but robots are just over 3' long (at most), so they've got essentially gobs of room to back up to readjust. And a good driver (potentially with tracking software help) will get "close enough" most of the time, considering the 9.5" - 12" opening of the tubes and the 2-3/4" size of the retention plate on the pegs.

Team 811 is just starting the 6WD vs. Mechanum (vs. Holonomic) debate; it's interesting to watch, considering we've never built either
__________________
"It's NOT Just A Robot Thing!"

Last edited by Mr_I : 09-01-2011 at 22:34. Reason: Corrected the size of the retention plate dimension
Reply With Quote