View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-01-2011, 13:22
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,757
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: bumpers for interior perimeter

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbeavers6790 View Post
last year lots of teams had openings in their bumpers to allow for a kicker mechanism, pusher, etc while the cutout will be differnet the idea that the inside of the cutout would not be the first thing to touch a vertical wall in a collision it wouldnt need bumpers if you have anything that would help me make sure i am correct in this idea i would appreciate it
Nobody in Michigan did, at least not among the 80% or more of teams that I saw. BUMPER coverage was required to be 100% last year too. The difference was that the BUMPER ZONE was higher last year, allowing the balls to go below the BUMPERS.

The issue is not the flat-wall test; the issue is the 100% BUMPER coverage requirement from <R07-A>.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote