Quote:
Originally Posted by thefro526
Thank the robot gods for an 84" cylinder.  |
Agreed: To all the people arguing that 2007 designs will be copied. some of those designs may have issues now thanks to different bumper rules now compared to 2007
Somebody should really do a poll on this: i thin the FIRST community is split on weather the 84" rule is a good or bad thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
FIRST. You made a horrible call, you took what was potentially a good engineering design challenge, and turned it into a last ditch effort to save their inferior (to vex) FTC design competition.
It's now a challenge of who can make the SAME minibot lighter. Yay.
|
Quoted for Truth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory
I have no desire to watch a battle of who sucks less. It's not inspiring to see whether the robot that takes 16 seconds to hang beats out the one that takes 14 seconds to hang. Slow=boring, regardless of whether it's a scenario where it ends up being a buzzer beater.
|
my thoughts exactly. I have no desire to watch a football game involving two bad teams, even if that game may end up having the most suspense that week.
a lot of those consistent hangers would still make the match exciting. Instead of going for the hang with 20 seconds left, the would go for it with 5 or 7 seconds left