
12-01-2011, 18:15
|
 |
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
 FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,746
|
|
|
Re: Ideal Alliance Configuration
The idea that the ideal alliance is anything but 3 robots that could do absolutely everything in the game is silly - nothing would have the strategic flexibility of that. Speaking of ideals in the alliance selection metagame is uninteresting and not nearly as fun as talking about the roles alliance partners can and will take.
I think that a tube relay is going to be nearly essential to an alliance at least at the regional level. Almost every robot will be able to hold tubes, but probably only one or two robots on an alliance will be able to reliably score them. That third bot would be best served in being a "tube passer", running a relay from the feeder lane to the caution line and dropping tubes for a robot to score on the floor. They may score a few of their own, especially in the end game, but an alliance with one or two good scorers will want to keep those good scorers scoring rather than wasting their time with retrieval.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
--2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
.
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
-- 2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design -- 2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
-- 2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
-- 2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 MN 10K Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
|