View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-30-2012, 05:06 PM
steelerborn's Avatar
steelerborn steelerborn is offline
Engineer at JBT FoodTech
AKA: Jonathan Stokes
FRC #5817 (Uni-Rex)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Clovis
Posts: 323
steelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond reputesteelerborn has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: My Rendition of Emperor Swerve

I would have to disagree with Adam.

Using larger bearing for the steering in the wheels is not very complex.
Adam's math may be right and you may be able to get away with regular bearings just fine (973 used swerve this year and if they used them it probably is). But I would say that it is not complex at all to design a swerve using larger bearings. There are several ways to decrease the amount of components it takes in the design.

I would say the dynamic load of thrust bearings is a lot greater, than normal bearings, and I usually fall on the side of it is better safe than sorry, which is why I prefer the larger OD thrust bearings. McMaster-carr sells them for a good price, and even have some neutral file formats available for CAD purposes.
__________________
Good enough is the enemy of anything great!
Reply With Quote